PENGARUH STRES KERJA DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA CLEANING SERVIS RS. MOH. NOER PAMEKASAN

Abstract

Abstrak:

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui: (1) pengaruh stres kerja dan lingkungan kerja secara simultan terhadap kinerja cleaning servis RS. Moh Noer Pamekasan. (2) variabel yang berpengaruh paling dominan antara stres kerja dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja cleaning servis RS. Moh Noer Pamekasan.m Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah bagian cleaning servis RS. Moh. Noer Pamekasan sebanyak 36 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah kuesioner. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) Stres kerja dan lingkungan kerja secara simultan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan denagn (F) bernilai positif sebesar 53.672 dan (sig.) adalah 0,000 lebih kecil dari 0,05. (2) Lingkungan kerja adalah variabel yang berpengaruh lebih dominan terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan nilai koefisien sebesar sebesar 0.527 atau 52.7%.. Artinya hipotesis dua yang peneliti ajukan diterima.

Abstract:

This research was conducted to determine: (1) the effect of work stress and work environment simultaneously on the performance of  cleaning services. Moh Noer hospital Pamekasan. (2) the variable that has the most dominant influence between work stress and work environment on the performance of cleaning services. Moh Noer hospital Pamekasan. This study uses a quantitative approach. The population in this study is the cleaning service section of the hospital. Moh. Noer Pamekasan as many as 36 people. The data collection technique used was a questionnaire. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that (1) work stress and work environment simultaneously had a positive and significant effect on employee performance with (F) a positive value of 53,672 and (sig.) 0.000, less than 0.05. (2) The work environment is a variable that has a more dominant effect on employee performance with a coefficient value of 0.527 or 52.7%. This means that the second hypothesis that the researcher proposed is accepted.